Parks and Protected Areas - Suffield National Wildlife Area

Breaking News -- EnCana avoids trial on charges of Canada Wildlife Act violation.

Nature Canada and our partners are disappointed to have learned in early January 2010 that the Crown has stayed the case against EnCana on charges of violating Canada’s Wildlife Act. Read the press release for details.

EnCana was scheduled to be tried on March 19, 2010, almost five years after EnCana installed a section of pipeline in the CFB Suffield National Wildlife Area without a permit (in March 2005). Numerous adjournments and a preliminary hearing were held in Medicine Hat, but now there will be no trial.

Explore this web page to learn about Suffield, where we stand on drilling inside Suffield, and to take action in defense of nature in Alberta.

Add Your Voice of Protest! Send a letter to the Government of Canada asking them to protect Suffield’s grasslands, sand hills, river breaks and wetlands.

The Future of Suffield National Wildlife Area:
Prairie Grasslands or Pipelines?

Drilling Permit Inside Protected Area Would Set Dangerous Precedent

Check out our video on Suffield wildlife, and what the future may hold for this precious prairie landscape

The wide open spaces of Suffield's prairie grasslands are a haven for wild life. Photo: Andy Teucher

Latest News

January 12, 2010: EnCana Avoids Trial on Charges of Canada Wildlife Act Violation in Suffield National Wildlife Area

January 28, 2009: Panel Confirms Need to Protect Suffield National Wildlife Area

October 3, 2008: Coalition Releases Video on Eve of Hearings

Sept. 18, 2008: EnCana Faces Charges of Violating Wildlife Act

April 22, 2008: Environmental Groups Challenge EnCana at Shareholders Meeting

Apr. 7, 2008 - Editorial: EnCana Drilling Endangers Rare Wildlife

Mar. 6, 2008 - Report Paints Grim Picture of Wildlife Areas in Canada

Feb. 19, 2008 - Submission to Suffield Panel

Related Links

Panel Decision: Summary and Analysis

Take Action! Send a Letter Demanding Suffield and its Wildlife be Protected!

Get Connected! Join the Suffield group on Facebook

Species at risk found in Suffield

Caught on Tape! See Suffield Wildlife Video!

Suffield National Wildlife Area near Medicine Hat, Alberta. Home to nearly 100 plant and animal species at risk of extinction. And 1,275 shallow gas wells and 220 km of pipeline if a proposed drilling project is allowed to proceed.

The Government of Canada established an NWA within the Canadian Forces Base at Suffield in 2003, and just two years later a proposed drilling project by energy giant EnCana Corp. threatened - and continues to put at risk - one of the last remaining large intact pieces of pristine prairie grasslands in Canada.

Learn more about Suffield NWA.

Nature Canada supporters have already raised their voices in alarm over this potentially precedent-setting development. No permit of this kind has ever been granted inside a national wildlife area in Canada, and in hundreds of letters you told the government that’s the way it should stay. Keep up the pressure!

Thanks to your letters, we convinced the government to conduct a full and public review of the proposed drilling project. This was an important first step, but the future of Suffield is still in doubt.

Public Hearings

Public hearings were held in October 2008. Thanks to your letters and support, Nature Canada was successful in convincing the panel to reject EnCana's plans. Read our press release for our initial response, or read Panel Decision: Summary and Analysis for a brief synopsis for more details.

Nature Canada poses the following questions regarding plans to develop inside Suffield National Wildlife Area:

  1. If Canadians cannot expect 16 federally listed species at risk to find safety inside a national wildlife area, where in the world can we expect our endangered species to exist in peace?
  2. Can Canada allow expanded drilling operations inside a protected area like Suffield NWA and still meet its international conservation commitments as laid out in agreements like the Convention on Biological Diversity?
  3. Does Canada really want to set the dangerous precedent of granting a permit for development inside a federally protected area, and risk rendering the very concept of “protected area” meaningless?

Thanks to your letters and support, Nature Canada was successful in convincing the panel to reject EnCana's plans. More details on the panel's recommendations.

For more information visit the following Web sites:

Suffield NWA
Suffield National Wildlife Area. Photo: Andy Teucher